Dyer: In Bolivia, a free and fair election

It turns out that mourning for the death of Bolivian democracy has been a bit premature.

The quotation is usually given as “Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely,” but Lord Acton’s original remark went on to say: “Great men are almost always bad men.”

And so they are.

article continues below

This is not to say all bad men in power are also great men. President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus, in power for 26 years, but currently fighting eviction after another rigged election, is clearly a bad man, but he is also a petty man of no discernible merit.

Evo Morales, president of Bolivia for 14 years, is certainly a great man — the first person of indigenous descent ever elected to lead a country in which only five per cent of the population is of European origin.

But he was ousted from power late last year and he deserved to be. He is sitting out the Oct. 18 election in exile in Argentina.

This has been taken by most people elsewhere (and not just people on the left) to mean there was a coup in Bolivia last year and that democracy there is in danger — or even at an end. That impression was reinforced by the fact the caretaker president for the past 11 months has been an extreme right-wing politician.

But it wasn’t really a coup; more of a car crash. The presidential election last year was followed by weeks of popular protests claiming it had been rigged to give Morales a narrow victory in the first round of voting.

Morales resigned when an investigation by the Organization of American States reported there had been “serious irregularities” in the vote and “clear manipulations” of the voting system. That was the right thing to do, but then his party, the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS), made an incredible blunder.

It boycotted an ad hoc meeting held by the opposition parties, the Catholic Church and representatives of the European Union to choose an interim president. All the senior MAS officials having resigned together with Morales, the choice fell on the second vice-president of the senate, an obscure politician named Jeanine Añez, who turned out to be a monster.

Within a week, journalists were digging up racist tweets in which she called Morales a “poor Indian” and declared an indigenous new year celebration “satanic.” In the same week, she fired all the military top brass, replacing them with her own appointees, and gave the police and soldiers blanket authority to use lethal force against protesters. At least 28 people were killed.

Añez seemed well on the way to enshrining the rule of the extreme right. Morales was banned from seeking the presidency again and, in May, she declared she would run for the presidency herself when the election was re-run. But now that election, much postponed because of the COVID-19 pandemic, has come around at last — and she has just withdrawn her candidacy.

It turns out that mourning for the death of Bolivian democracy has been a bit premature. The leading candidate in this election is still from the MAS, a man named Luis Arce, a former economy minister who oversaw the nationalization program under Morales.

Arce’s main opponent is the same man Morales faced last year — ex-president Carlos Mesa, a former journalist and professor who is centre-left politically. Añez withdrew to give the other hard-right candidate, Luis Fernando Camacho, a better chance of getting through to the second round, but he still probably won’t make it.

The second round remains the key issue. The rules say the leading candidate wins in the first round if he or she gets 40 per cent of the vote and is at least 10 points ahead of the nearest rival. If not, the two leading candidates go through to the second round, but then the supporters of all the losing candidates will probably unite behind the challenger to defeat the socialist (who is invariably the leader in the first round).

Morales did not have a 10-point lead over Mesa last year when 85 per cent of the votes had been counted, but then the quick count stopped for no clear reason for a full day. When it resumed, Morales ended up with a 10.1 per cent lead. So no second round and Morales wins. That’s when the mass protests started — and rightly so.

An unexplained halt of that duration in the vote-counting always means they are fixing the outcome. Given Morales’s past record — he held a referendum to end the two-term limit on the presidency, lost it, then got an MAS-dominated court to set the referendum result aside and end term limits — not too many people were willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

His time is up, but the MAS under Arce’s leadership could still win this election. If it doesn’t, then Mesa will probably become president, which would not be a disaster, either. Democracy is not dead in Bolivia.

Gwynne Dyer’s new book is Growing Pains: The Future of Democracy (and Work).

© Kamloops This Week



Question of the Week POLL

The NHL season begins on Jan. 13, with teams in an all-Canadian division playng each other. Which team will finish first?

or  view results

Popular Kamloops This Week

Events Calendar

Help Us Help Kamloops. Support Local Media.

In response to the COVID-19 crisis, Kamloops This Week is now soliciting donations from readers. This program is designed to support our local journalism in a time where our advertisers are unable to due to their own economic constraints. Kamloops This Week has always been a free product and will continue to be free. This is a means for those who can afford to support local media to help ensure those who can’t afford to can get access to trusted local information. You can make a one-time or a monthly donation of any amount and cancel at any time .

NEW: For every donation of $25 or greater, we will offer a digital advertising package to the local non-profit group of your choice.

Click on https://support.kamloopsthisweek.com for more information or to make your donation.

Thank you in advance for your support.