Dyer: Making sense of the EU elections

The best way of describing what just happened in the European Union elections is to say the choices are getting clearer — and a lot of people are realizing which side they are on.

The elections to the EU Parliament held last week in 28 European countries — including the United Kingdom, since three years after the Brexit referendum, it still hasn’t managed to leave — was the second-biggest democratic exercise in the world. Only India’s elections are bigger. About 400-million Europeans were eligible to vote and half of them actually did.

article continues below

The choice before them, in most member countries, was less EU or more EU.

Should the European Union become the semi-detached Europe of the Fatherlands the nationalists and the populists demand or continue to work on creating joint institutions (like the euro common currency) that bring the members closer together?

There will never be a single answer to that question, but the two sides are sorting themselves out and you can now get a feel for the way things are going.

The hard-line nationalists took 30 per cent of the vote in Italy (the Lega), 32 per cent in the U.K. (the Brexit Party), 45 per cent in Poland (the Law and Justice Party), and 52 per cent in Viktor Orban’s illiberal democracy in Hungary.

Yet, apart from the Brexit Party, they are no longer trying to leave the EU.

Populist demagogues in other EU countries — who five years ago were advocating a Frexit in France, a Nexit in the Netherlands and so on — have watched the tragicomic mega-shambles of Britain’s attempted Brexit and decided the wiser course is to stay in the EU and try to dominate it from within.

They made some headway in this election, but they still control only 112 of the European Parliament’s 750 seats. It’s not even certain that they can all come together as a single bloc. France’s National Rally, for example, is seen by some other far-right parties in the EU as too pro-Russian and encumbered by a history of anti-Semitism. If this is a tidal wave, it’s a fairly small one.

There was another, slightly bigger tsunami on the more EU side of the argument, mainly because the Greens did so well, finishing second in Germany and third in France. Strongly pro-EU liberal parties did well too — notably the Liberal Democrats in the U.K., who came second there — and together they have added more seats on that side of the argument than the nationalists did on the other extreme.

The real value of this election is that it offers a reality check on the burning question of the day: Is Trumpism really going to sweep Europe like it swept America? The answer is no, or at least, not so much.

Nationalist parties that strike authoritarian postures and flirt with racist, anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim themes did well in some Eastern European countries (although they have few immigrants and almost no Muslims). But in Western Europe, only one populist party, Italy’s Lega, improved on its last showing.

In France, the National Rally got only 24 per cent of the vote, whereas its predecessor, the National Front, garnered 34 per cent of the vote in the 2017 presidential election.

The Brexit Party in the United Kingdom received 32 per cent of the vote, which sounds impressive, since its predecessor, the United Kingdom Independence Party, managed only 26 per cent in the last EU election in 2014. But if you add the Conservative vote (which is mostly pro-Brexit) to the Brexit Party vote in this election and compare it with the UKIP/Conservative votes last time, the pro-Brexit share of the vote is down from 49 per cent in 2014 to 41 per cent today.

This suggests the Trump virus is less virulent in Europe and raises the further question: Will the U.K. really crash out of the EU by Oct. (the current deadline) or will there be a second referendum that calls off the whole quixotic enterprise?

It’s starting to feel like Brexit never happening is around a 50-50 proposition.

One symptom of the fear Brexiters now feel is their increasingly shrill insistence there must be no new referendum. Never mind that Nigel Farage, founder of both UKIP and the Brexit Party, talked about a second referendum when it looked like “Remain” was going to score a narrow win early on the evening of the first referendum in 2016. It ended up 52 per cent “Leave” and 48 per cent “Remain.”

Never mind, either, that Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has just announced she will publish draft legislation on a second referendum on Scottish independence from the U.K. this week. The first one, in 2014, rejected independence by a 55-44 per cent vote.

The Brexit referendum is sacred, Brexiters say, and nobody is allowed to change their mind about it. However, the EU election was treated by almost all British voters as an informal referendum on Brexit and it’s now pretty clear what would happen in a real one.

It’s going to be a very hectic five months in British politics.

Read more Gwynne Dyer columns online at kamloopsthisweek.com, under the Opinion tab.

© Kamloops This Week


KTW Daily News Alerts

Question of the Week POLL

Did you try to book a campsite when the online portal opened on May 25? If so, how did you do?

or  view results

Popular Kamloops This Week

Events Calendar

It’s time. Support your local media.

In response to the COVID-19 crisis, Kamloops This Week is now soliciting donations from readers. This program is designed to support our local journalism in a time where our advertisers are unable to due to their own economic constraints. Kamloops This Week has always been a free product and will continue to be free. This is a means for those who can afford to support local media to help ensure those who can’t afford to can get access to trusted local information. You can make a one-time or a monthly donation of any amount and cancel at any time.

Click on https://support.kamloopsthisweek.com for more information or to make your donation.

Thank you in advance for your support.